The Four Shifts — How I Think About Change (and Why It Matters)

A different perspective of the Golden Gate bridge, shifting the perspective of what we ordinarily see helps us see things differently

Same bridge. Different angle. Everything changes.

My brother is one of the best dog trainers I know. Twenty years in, he's seen everything — or close to it. One day he told me something I haven't been able to shake.

"Dude," he said, "I get called in to work with the dog. The dog doesn't listen, the dog is acting up, the dog is obsessive, the dog doesn't stop, on and on. Basically, they want me to deal with the dog. Train the dog. Change the dog's behavior. And 98% of the time — the ones who need the training are the humans. Dogs are being dogs. They behave exactly as dogs do. They don't have a problem. They're exposed to a situation and they respond accordingly. It's the human who needs to understand what the dog needs and wants. Once they get that part, I can actually start working with the dog — and they discover a whole new animal in their household."

That, to me, is leadership in a sentence. The problem is almost never where you think it is.

The Director Who Had Everything — Except Time

I thought about that conversation a lot while working with a director I'll call Alex. He came to me overwhelmed — the kind of overwhelmed where you're barely staying afloat and someone's telling you to start learning to fly. His team was constantly pulling him away from the strategic work his role required, with questions on how to handle situations they should have been able to handle themselves. His internal clients — other departments in the organization — needed access to information only he knew how to find and package, and requests were coming in from every direction, every channel, all marked urgent. And somewhere above all of that, his boss needed him to stop firefighting long enough to actually look at the future: where was the business unit headed, what were they building toward, how did they position themselves for what was coming next year.

The message he kept hearing: "Hurry up, work faster, be more productive — so that you can find time to plan for what's next." Anyone who's ever been in that spot knows exactly how that feels.

What made it harder was that Alex was sitting on a gold mine nobody was paying attention to. Because he was in the trenches every day, he had front-row seats to every broken process, every gap, every bottleneck in the organization. He had insights that could have benefited a dozen departments. But nobody thought to ask what it was like on the front lines. Nobody saw him as the asset he actually was.

We spent three months in weekly conversations covering everything I'm about to walk you through. And in that time, Alex made four distinct shifts — not in what he did, but in how he was seeing and operating. The results followed. But I'll come back to that.

Before I get into the four shifts, one thing worth naming: leadership isn't a title. It's not about being the boss or having followers. Leadership is a role we step into and out of in a moment's notice — a conscious choice we make, actively, in real time. It doesn't just happen. What it does leave behind is an intentional wake — the kind that inspires and compels others to move in the same direction. That's what we're really talking about when we talk about shifting how you operate.

‍ ‍

The Four Shifts.

‍ ‍

From Perception To Perspective‍ ‍

Every decision you make starts with how you see the situation. The problem is we all carry built-in filters — experiences, assumptions, blind spots — that quietly narrow what's visible to us. Shifting from perception to perspective means learning to step outside those filters. Not to abandon your point of view, but to hold it more lightly, so that opportunities, patterns, and possibilities that were always there suddenly come into focus. This is where every meaningful shift begins.‍ ‍

What Alex Couldn't See

Alex's first filter was a reasonable one: I have too much work. On the surface, that was true. But underneath it was a story he hadn't questioned — that the only way through was to work faster, get more efficient, clear the queue. What he couldn't see yet was that he was the queue. Every question his team brought him, he answered. Every request from an internal client, he handled personally. Every strategic task his boss needed, he started — when he could find a window. The system was working exactly as designed, and he was the design flaw.

The shift wasn't about working differently. It was about seeing differently. When he stopped asking how do I get through all of this and started asking why is all of this coming to me — the picture changed completely. That's what a trusted advisor actually does: not give you the answer, but help you see what you've stopped being able to see.

‍ ‍

From Control To Influence‍ ‍

Most of the stress leaders carry comes from trying to control things that were never theirs to control — outcomes, other people's decisions, the market, the timing. What you actually have, and what most leaders underestimate, is influence: over your own behavior, the culture you build, the conversations you lead, the environment you create. When you stop chasing control and start owning your influence, leadership gets both more effective and a lot less exhausting.

When Helpfulness Becomes a Trap ‍

Alex had become the answer machine. Not because he was a control freak — he wasn't. But because he was good at his job, and over time, being the person with the answers had become part of his identity. His team had learned to come to him. His internal clients had learned to come to him. And the more he answered, the more they came.

Control, in his case, looked like helpfulness. But it was costing him everything.

The shift came when he started asking a different question: not what's the answer but who on my team can own this, and what do they need from me to get there. He stopped being the answer and started being the architect of a team that could find its own answers. His job became building the conditions — the clarity, the process, the confidence — for his people to operate without him. That's influence. It's quieter than control. And it compounds.

Within a few months, his team was coming to him for guidance — not the answer, but the kind of direction that helped them find it themselves. His internal clients were going through proper channels, triaged by his team, fed back into a shared knowledge base. And Alex finally had his hands free.

‍ ‍

From Time To Energy Management

You can have all the time in the world and still show up depleted. Most productivity systems are built around time — blocking it, protecting it, optimizing it. But time is finite and identical for everyone. Energy isn't. When you manage your energy — physical, mental, emotional — you show up differently in the hours you have. This is the shift that separates leaders who last from those who flame out, and it's the one most people ignore until it's too late.

The High Performer's Blind Spot

Here's what nobody tells high performers: being good at something is not the same as it being yours to do.

Alex was good at answering questions. He was good at packaging information for internal clients. He was good at firefighting. That competence had made him indispensable — and indispensability, in this context, was a trap. He was spending his highest-quality hours — the ones where he was sharpest, most focused, most creative — on work that someone else could have done. The work only he could do — the strategic thinking, the pattern recognition, the planning — was getting the leftovers.

Energy management, in practice, meant getting ruthlessly honest about that mismatch. Not delegating because he was overwhelmed. Delegating because the work didn't belong to him — and keeping it was costing the organization the thing it actually needed most from him. Once he saw it that way, the guilt of letting go disappeared. It wasn't abdication. It was precision.

From Binary To Workability

Binary thinking feels like clarity but it's often a trap. Right or wrong. Win or lose. Fixed or broken. The problem is real situations are almost never binary — and when you force them into that frame, you spend your energy judging instead of moving. A workability mindset asks a different question: not "is this right?" but "does this work, and what would make it work better?" It's the shift from evaluation to momentum, and it's the fastest way out of stuck.

The Restaurant Test

I learned this one in the kitchen. Twelve years on the restaurant floor will cure you of the need to be right pretty fast — because there's no right way to make a dish. There are ways that work and ways that don't, depending on what you have, who you're cooking for, what's in season, what broke down in prep, what the table actually ordered versus what they thought they wanted. You improvise. You adapt. You ask: given what I have right now, what's the most workable version of this?

Leadership works the same way.

Alex's binary trap was a common one: either I do it, or it doesn't get done right. It felt like a standard — a commitment to quality. In practice, it meant he was the only person trusted to touch anything important. When we started working with workability instead, the question became: what would need to be true for someone else to handle this well? Not whether they could do it exactly as he would — but whether they could do it well enough to create the outcome the situation actually required.

That reframe opened everything up. Processes got built. The team got trusted. The knowledge base got populated. And Alex — for the first time in a long time — got to think.

Not Steps. Dimensions. ‍

These four shifts don't operate in sequence. They're not steps. They're more like dimensions — you're working in all of them at once, even if one is more active at any given time.

Three Months Later

Alex, three months in: his team comes to him when they genuinely need his guidance — not his answer. His internal clients move through a triage system his team runs. His colleagues invited him to sit on the steering committee — the room where decisions about the company's future actually get made. And his boss can now tap into his thinking on where their group is heading in the medium and long term. None of that was possible at the start — not because the situation was impossible, but because of how he was seeing it, how he was operating inside it, and what he believed was his to carry.

What I've found, across every client I've worked with, is that you don't have to crack all four to start seeing change. You usually crack one — and the others start to loosen.

That's what coaching makes possible. Not a new system. A different operating system.

And it works because leadership — real leadership — isn't a title. It's not about being the boss. It's not about having followers. It's a role we step into and out of in a moment's notice, an active choice made consciously, in real time. What it leaves behind is an intentional wake — the kind that moves people, that creates conditions for others to rise, that makes the system better whether you're in the room or not.‍ ‍

That's what the four shifts are really about. Not becoming a different person. Becoming more fully the leader you already are.


If you're curious about what this work looks like in practice → Work with me

Next
Next

Show Up And Be Seen